Former US Treasury Secretary: CRE Sector Will Survive The Coming 2023 Recession

In the upcoming recession, the former US Treasury Secretary sees “significant ferment and opportunity” for the CRE markets.

Former US Treasury Secretary, Lawrence Summers, reassured CRE CEOs that “if the vehicle’s moving faster, we need a firmer brake, but it doesn’t imply we’ll hit the wall before the car stops” on a day when a stubbornly high inflation rate dashed hopes for a smooth landing for the US economy.

Hessam Nadji, CEO of Marcus & Millichap, conducted a wide-ranging online debate on Tuesday. In it, Summers projected that the Fed’s ongoing rate hikes will soon lead to a “recession of choice” that will end the record-breaking employment creation of the previous year.

Summers stated, “The Fed seeks to limit it by constraining demand by hiking rates. We have constant inflation owing to a conflict between supply and demand. My best judgment is that the economy will enter a recession and that employment creation will slow down in the coming year.”

The economy, and the CRE sector in particular, is far better prepared to survive an economic crisis than it was in 2008 when the housing market crashed, according to the former Treasury director.
Summers said, “We won’t see something like 2008 again,” pointing out how much less indebted homeowners have, how the inventory is not overstocked, and how much stronger and more cautious lenders are now than they were before the sub-prime crisis.

Summers suggested that the recession would not start for a few months since fundamentals like consumer spending are still strong and have some capacity to increase.

“It’s important to keep in mind that there is still a significant savings overhang. According to Summers, $2 trillion was the amount of money that individuals were unable to spend because of the epidemic.
Only $300 billion of the total had been spent; more than half was still in checking accounts. That seems to me that customers will persist. Due to discounted salaries, I don’t believe they will run out of money to spend,” he remarked.

Summers advised CRE participants not to assume that “structural” developments, such as the increase in remote work and the boom in e-commerce, that have been triggered by the epidemic, will have a detrimental influence on the demand for CRE.

Even in a year or two when there is no employment growth, there will be significant ferment and opportunity in the CRE markets, according to Summers.

The former US Treasury Secretary adds “Many individuals believe that working from home will be awful. That is untrue.” According to him, the movement of people into new areas creates a need for real estate. He also said that the pandemic’s quick rise in e-commerce increased the need for warehouses exponentially.

Summers believes hybrid work is here to stay in the office sector, but he does not think it will have the same impact on office footprints as some may anticipate.

Many will travel far away from work as the need to live closer to the workplace lessens. He said employers will become a little more tolerant of workers working from home as they make improvements to their oversight of remote workers.

But if employees work three days a week, the employers will want them to come in on those days, so there won’t be as much of an influence on office footprints, according to Summers.

The former Treasury Secretary made a forecast that is a sweet relief to the commercial real estate industry, stating that CRE, with cap rates presently averaging 5.7% across asset classes, represents an attractive investment option when compared to equities and bonds.

In the upcoming months and years, “the position of CRE in portfolios is going to be bigger,” Summers said.

According to Summers, commercial real estate should have a bigger presence in many portfolios. It is very tax advantageous, and it seems even better after taxes.

“A bond currently yields 3.3 percent, and that is all it will continue to yield after 10 years. Property values are far more likely to increase over ten years. It will rise, not fall.” he continued.

The SVN Vanguard team can help with your Commercial Real Estate needs. We can help you find the ideal commercial property for sale or lease. Interested in discussing a sale-leaseback? Contact us.

Although there has been a welcome decrease in commodity prices, interest rates are here to stay.

Commercial real estate experts won’t be overjoyed by the Federal Reserve’s September Beige Book, also known as the “Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by the Federal Reserve District.” However, the good news offers optimism for some reprieve in construction, while the bad news is already known.

First, the obvious bad: don’t expect an early end to interest rate hikes since “price levels remained substantially elevated,” which indicates that inflation is still occurring. 
In spite of the fact that nine of the Fed’s 12 districts “reported some degree of moderation in their rate of increase,” indicating that at least the rate at which inflation was increasing had slowed, the report stated that “substantial price increases were reported across all districts, particularly for food, rent, utilities, and hospitality services.” That’s a crucial indicator that prices will finally stabilize. But it appears that is still a ways off.

“The Fed still has an inflation concern and is determined to front-load rate hikes as aggressively as possible,” says Jeffrey Roach, chief economist at LPL Financial.”If next week’s inflation report surprises positively, the chances of a 75-basis point boost later this month may grow.”
The Fed also pointed out that certain aspects of real estate still face difficulties. It was noted in the study that, “despite some reports of strong leasing activity, residential real estate conditions weakened noticeably as home sales fell in all twelve districts and residential construction remained constrained by input shortages. Commercial real estate activity softened, particularly demand for office space. “Loan demand was mixed; while financial institutions reported generally strong demand for credit cards and commercial and industrial loans, residential loan demand was weak amid elevated mortgage interest rates.”
The districts that specifically mentioned real estate included Boston, where the outlook deteriorated; Richmond, where activity was flat to slightly down, Atlanta, where there was a mix of commercial and residential real estate activity, Chicago, where construction and real estate declined slightly, and San Francisco, where residential activity slowed.

There were also some encouraging developments in the crucial field of materials. The report stated that lower fuel prices and a decline in overall demand helped to relieve cost constraints, particularly those related to freight transportation rates. However, manufacturing and construction input costs remained high. However, most contacts outside of the Federal Reserve system believed price pressures would last at least through the end of the year. “Several districts reported some tapering in prices for steel, lumber, and copper.”

The SVN Vanguard team knows investors need an experienced commercial property management company by their side. Contact us for multifamily, industrial, office, retail, and general commercial properties for sale.

Inflation and interest rate fears are dismissed by survey respondents, but the market may be due for a “recalibration.”

While CRE transactions may level off this year, investor sentiment is still positive, according to a recent Marcus & Millichap investor poll.

The headline index number of 159 in the mid-year poll is “somewhat similar to the path we witnessed in 2016,” according to John Chang of Marcus & Millichap, in which confidence somewhat dipped as rising interest rates bit into the market. But they’re not down as much as one might anticipate, he adds.
The index fell 12 points in 2016 and there was a flattening of CRE transactions. In what Chang refers to as a “very minor softening,” the index has dropped 11 points this year, and it might produce comparable outcomes.

According to him, “yes, the market is seeing a recalibration as investors redo numbers based on the increasing cost of capital, but the survey respondents aren’t telegraphing a substantial market change.”
The poll indicates that interest rates and inflation are the two main issues for investors. Almost 9% said they would buy more commercial real estate as interest rates rise, while more than two-thirds said they would not change their investment plans as rates rise.On the sell side, 77% claimed that the rate hikes had not changed their plans, and 11% claimed that they intended to sell more as a result.

The survey found that participants disregarded inflation even more. However, over 12% of respondents indicated they would buy more CRE. Twenty-four percent of respondents said they would buy less CRE. A higher percentage of investors overall indicated they would purchase more of the more inflation-resistant property types, such as flats, hotels, and self-storage, with 14.4% indicating they would do so.

In addition to rising interest rates, cap rates are anticipated to climb as well; according to 14% of investors questioned, cap rates will increase by 50 basis points or more during the next year. About 35% predict an increase of less than that, while 27% predict no change. According to Chang, yields and stability look appealing because there is still a lot of cash flowing into CRE.

Think about the fact that the year that just ended, in the second quarter of 2022, was by far the busiest for commercial real estate investment transactions ever, Chang advises. The upcoming year “will probably rank as the second most active year, even if activity slows down a little.

The SVN Vanguard team can help with your Commercial Real Estate needs. We can help you find the ideal commercial property for sale or lease. Interested in discussing a sale-leaseback? Contact us.

1. FUTURES MARKET FORECASTS 75 BP HIKE

2. BEIGE BOOK ANALYSIS

3. CMBS DELINQUENCIES

4. SINGLE FAMILY RENTAL CMBS ISSUANCE

5. INDEPENDENT LANDLORD RENTAL PERFORMANCE

6. CONSUMER SENTIMENT

7. JOBS REPORT

8. MALL VISITS FALL ACROSS U.S.

9. MANUFACTURING PMI

10. POST-GFC HIGH FOR AD&C LOANS

 

SUMMARY OF SOURCES

 

In the first half of the year, fewer than 80,000 new households were built, which cooled the market as economic headwinds accelerated.

After a protracted period during which the asset class was experiencing high demand, the third quarter saw a slight decline in demand for multifamily housing as household formation returned to normal and inflation started to affect consumer budgets.

According to a recent Marcus & Millichap analysis, the average effective monthly rent in the United States increased by almost 16 percent in 2021, with certain Sun Belt markets seeing increases of more than 25 percent in just the previous year. But as economic headwinds accelerated, 80,000 fewer households were generated in the first half of the year, depressing the market.

Nevertheless, the research observes that “even with a slower second half, vacancy at midyear leaves ample leeway before rates in most metros approach pre-pandemic levels.” Overall, according to Marcus & Millichap experts, the sector’s future is still promising.
“Despite the 60 basis-point rise in national apartment vacancy during the first half, approximately 20 percent fewer rentals available at midyear across the U.S. compared to year-end 2019,” they claim. “These circumstances and the steep barriers to homeownership support sustained momentum in the apartment sector.”

Over the past two years, the median price of a single-family house has increased by more than 30%, and mortgage rates have reached levels that many customers haven’t experienced in their adult lifetimes. Has a single-family median price. Additionally, according to the firm, “this is widening the affordability gap, or the difference between an average monthly payment on a median priced home and an average rent obligation.” The affordability gap is now more than $1,000 per month, which is roughly three times the size of pre-pandemic norms.

According to the research, “the cost-saving benefits, coupled with lifestyle elements, locational advantages, and flexibility, will sustain apartment demand.”

The SVN Vanguard team can help with your multifamily real estate needs. We can help you find the ideal multifamily property for sale or lease. Interested in discussing a sale-leaseback? Contact us.

RSM reported that sales volume and cap rates were slightly easing.

According to a study this week from RSM, real estate funds seem to be maintaining their path and accounting for a small overall cooling of the market.

The volume of sales transactions and associated cap rates realized in those transactions have both decreased, it was claimed, and fundraising is adopting the same mentality.

Since interest rate increases and inflationary pressures suggest that a possible impending recession may be imminent, investors are currently on the defensive and reevaluating values and strategy. RSM stated that capital is being directed toward core and core-plus assets, value-add investments, and less risky initiatives.

Real estate investment may have slowed down from its record-breaking rate in 2021, but prices are still significantly higher than they were before the pandemic, and there is still enough of money for investors to keep spending.

Finance Is Generally Affordable

According to RSM, property cash flow, particularly from multifamily and industrial properties, is still strong, and financing is still quite affordable.

According to the statement, “We anticipate transaction volume to pick up in the fourth quarter of 2022 or early 2023 as fund managers reevaluate their strategy and the return expectations of their investors, looking to deploy cash that has been sitting on the sidelines.”

Cap rate compression on a global scale

Even the “darlings” of the pandemic, multifamily and industrial, saw cap rates compressed.

Compared to an average reduction of 0.15% over the preceding three years, multifamily cap rates have decreased by 0.79% since the second quarter of 2020, according to CoStar.

RSM claimed that because of growing values, it has become harder for acquisitions to meet investment objectives.

The SVN Vanguard team can help with your Commercial Real Estate needs. We can help you find the ideal commercial property for sale or lease. Interested in discussing a sale-leaseback? Contact us.

In addition, if compared to the past, would “high” inflation actually be that high?

According to a Bloomberg story, if you believe that rising inflation is only a transitory issue and that everything will return to normal before the pandemic, you disagree with some of the largest bond investors in the world. They believe that the Federal Reserve’s target of 2% inflation is essentially an impossible dream, which is why they have piled up on inflation-protected bonds, increased their exposure to commodities, and maintained a sizable cash reserve.
Cheap energy and labor kept inflation low over a protracted period of growing globalization. (A sober addition would likely be the long-term cheap monetary supply that central banks kept thinking would boost GDP.)
But it’s time to take a deep breath. Look up the U.S. yearly inflation rate for the past few years. The Fed’s goal inflation rate of 2% was greatly exceeded for numerous stretches. The commercial real estate market did not collapse.Looking at the recent past is something that might confuse people. According to Kevin Swill, CEO of Thirty Capital Financial, “to have a market, with low interest rates for more than 12 years, does not follow logic or the cycle that existed for decades.”
However, returning to normal does not guarantee that it will be painless, especially in light of the investment methods that were used in conjunction with those low rates. “Levered investors might struggle to cover debt service and secure loans if cap rates spreads to interest rates narrow,” said DWS Group’s U.S. Real Estate Strategic Outlook for July. “Real estate leasing could also retrench amid job losses and dwindling profits. Indeed, recessions have been the proximate cause of every broad-based decline in real estate prices since the early 1960s.”
Additionally, as the Fed attempts to restrain growth, increasing inflation will result in continuous higher interest rates. That will have an impact on the price of finance as a whole.
Peter Tuffo, president of the south region for Suffolk Construction, claims that the real-estate industry runs on credit and the fundamentals of real estate are out of balance. Real estate investment is tied to confidence, and some projects are simply not penciling out. Real estate responds negatively to higher risk.”
Rogelio Carrasquillo, managing shareholder and cofounder at Carrasquillo Law Group, tells GlobeSt.com that “this situation has a significant effect on bridge and short-term loans that become more expensive for developers. As a result, programs such as EB-5 and other alternative sources of financing that would not be considered otherwise, become viable alternatives for the financing and development of commercial real estate projects.”
Even said, not all is lost because, according to Zachary Streit, founder and managing partner at WAY Capital, “inflation could also mean higher rent growth and NOI that could offset some of the impact of higher interest rates.” Additionally, “We are seeing a trend of more deals getting done with fixed rate financings and some sort of partial recourse or creative financing structures like PACE to offset today’s higher rates offered by floating rate lenders.”
The SVN Vanguard team knows investors need an experienced commercial property management company by their side. Contact us for multifamily, industrial, office, retail, and general commercial properties for sale.

1. INFLATION

2. INFLATION REDUCTION ACT IMPACT ON CRE

3. STAGFLATION RISK TO CRE

4. SURGING RETAIL INVENTORIES

5. JOBS REPORT

6. LAW FIRM LEASING ACTIVITY

7. CAP RATES

8. INVESTMENT VOLUMES

9. LOAN MATURITIES

10. ADAPTIVE REUSE ON THE RISE

 

SUMMARY OF SOURCES

When is it more advantageous to raise equity capital through a fund structure as opposed to one transaction at a time?

One of the most crucial pieces of a real estate investment and development firm is raising equity funds. Numerous smaller and mid-sized real estate corporations have a main operating organization and a number of affiliated limited partnerships and limited liability companies that own the real estate assets and contain equity investments from different investor groups. Typically, the general partner or managing member of these investment firms is an affiliate of the operating company.
 
The operating entity is typically owned by a family or an entrepreneur and serves as the public face of the business. In spite of the abundance of capital in today’s booming real estate market, it can be quite difficult for smaller and midsized businesses to raise equity financing. The associated flow-through organizations that own the individual properties often handle it deal by deal. Take for instance, a well-established medium-sized CRE investment business on the West Coast, may have any number of associated partnerships and limited liability corporations that collectively control $300 million worth of CRE properties, with $200 million in debt and $100 million in equity.
 
The operational company and the general partner or managing member of these organizations must manage all the different mortgages, equity offers, private placement memorandums, partnership agreements, subscription agreements, etc. throughout time. For example if there are 25 deals and 400 different investors in the twenty-five deals, the typical equity investment is $250,000. 
 
When does it make sense to start raising equity money in a fund structure as opposed to one deal at a time? This is a topic that many of these smaller and mid-sized real estate enterprises need to consider as their business grows. For equity capital, a fund structure is more effective. It’s less expensive in terms of fees, paperwork, and legal costs, and takes less time to complete. Raising equity for 25 different projects one at a time may potentially result in missed investment opportunities if the general partner is unable to swiftly obtain the necessary equity capital to take advantage of good agreements that call for a speedy closing. In contrast to the six to ten years it may take to accumulate twenty-five independent real estate acquisitions, the general partner might have placed all the properties in the fund if the fund had a $100 million equity raise.
 
As with any investment program, gravitating to a fund structure is not an easy undertaking, and the first one is always the most challenging. However, for any seasoned real estate investment firm, the advantages exceed the disadvantages by a wide margin. Who will sell the fund’s equity is the main issue with a fund structure. Only accredited investors, such as high net worth individuals, pension plans, endowments, registered investment advisors, and wealth managers, are often catered to by CRE private placement funds. A minimum yearly income of $200,000 ($300,000 if a joint investment) or a net worth of at least $1 million, excluding the investor’s primary residence, qualify as accredited investors. To market the fund’s units, the majority of companies will need to work with an experienced securities firm, broker-dealer, or other placement agency; the cost of this service ranges between 5% and 7% of the fund’s equity raised. As placement agents for third-party funds, there are a lot of independent broker-dealers and real estate brokerage companies.
 
The unit size of the offering is the next crucial factor. Depending on the fund’s investors, unit sizes will vary. If mostly people, then $100,000 per unit is typical. $250,000 per unit or more is typical if the fund targets multiple institutions. What is the fund’s investing strategy, which is the following crucial question? For instance, would the fund diversify throughout the four main CRE sectors of office, retail, flats, and industrial, or will it invest in a single type of property, such as apartments? Will the fund invest in or engage in development in specialized CRE markets like senior living, modular housing, and self-storage? Will the investments in the fund also be diversified by industry and by geography? This is important and a means of lowering portfolio risk. For instance, a fund that buys office buildings in No. California and Silicon Valley lack industry, geographic, and property type diversity. These regions’ economies are driven by the technology sector, therefore any downturn there will be disastrous for the portfolio. Additionally, any fees or payments from the fund, the investor desired return, and ownership interests must be decided by the fund’s sponsor or general partner.
 
For organizing the private placement, locating the properties to be purchased, and setting up the financing for the properties, the sponsor of many private placements is charged an upfront fee of 1% to 2%. Additionally, there is an annual asset management fee for managing the fund of.5%-1.5% of the equity raised. A quarterly fee for asset management is charged. The preferred yearly return on investment for the investors will normally range from 5% to 10%, and they will own between 70% and 80% of the fund. In addition to receiving a carrying interest of 20% to 30%, the general partner or sponsor will also be expected to contribute.5% to 5% of the stock offering in cash. It is necessary for the sponsor to make an equity investment in order to put some money, even if it is little, at risk and to better align its interests with those of the investors. A crucial step in the development of the rising medium-sized CRE investment firm into a more institutionally focused investor is raising capital in a fund structure.
The SVN Vanguard team can help with your Commercial Real Estate Investment needs. We can help you find the ideal commercial property for sale or lease. Interested in discussing a sale-leaseback? Contact us.

Banks with a high proportion of commercial real estate loans will be subject to more scrutiny from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

According to American Banker, the government agency cited uncertainty surrounding labor and commerce following the coronavirus outbreak as the primary reason for the increased checks and balances.

The FDIC’s Summer 2022 Supervisory Insight bulletin states that there will be a greater emphasis on new loan activity, as well as subsectors and geographical locations suffering difficulty.

Although the majority of the banks under the FDIC’s supervision are smaller organizations, these businesses have made sizable loans to the sector. During the previous year, banks under FDIC supervision owned 41% of the $2.7T in commercial real estate loans.

 
FDIC inspectors noted that,  “The dollar volume of CRE loans is at an historic high, and a growing number of banks report CRE concentrations…The majority of banks with CRE loan concentrations are satisfactorily rated. Nevertheless, CRE loan concentrations add dimensions of risk that necessitate continued attention from banks and their regulators, especially as the pandemic lingers and uncertainties remain.”
 

Sectors are not being impacted evenly. According to the analysis, pandemic trends like the shift from in-person to online buying, particularly in denser urban regions, might pose problems for the portfolio health of banks.

FDIC inspectors are still circumspect even if default rates for homes affected by the pandemic are not double-digit high as they were in 2020.

 
“While more recently improved, the delinquency rates remain above pre-pandemic levels. The [FDIC Quarterly] article indicates that economic stress caused by the pandemic is one of the challenges facing the CRE industry and the lending landscape,” the FDIC bulletin states.
 

Several local banks have begun to keep an eye out for any industry weak spots. Executives at Fifth Third Bank increased reserves in their commercial real estate portfolio, citing “key risks” such rapid rate increases and labor shortages.

Since the majority of its transactions have been with small CRE clients in the previous six months, First Republic Bank Chief Banking Officer Michael Selfridge stated during an earnings call that the bank has also been extra cautious and selective.

 
Between the first and second quarters, bank lending into the commercial real estate sector decreased by more than $8 billion, according to Trepp data cited by The Wall Street Journal.
The SVN Vanguard team knows investors need an experienced commercial property management company by their side. Contact us for multifamily, industrial, office, retail, and general commercial properties for sale.


San Diego Retail Property for lease
SVN Vanguard
San Diego commercial rental property
LOS ANGELES OFFICE
Orange County commercial office
100 W Broadway
Long Beach, CA 90802
License # 01840569
Phone Number
562-600-6565
Fax Number
714-242-9992
San Diego commercial real estate listings
FIND US ON MAP
San Diego commercial lease

©SVN Vanguard | LOS ANGELES| All SVN® Offices Independently Owned and Operated